Skip to content

Synchronicity according to Carl Jung

Synchronicity is a concept that was coined by Carl Gustav Jung, one of the pioneers of depth psychology. It is a fascinating and complex theory that attempts to explain certain significant events that occur in our lives that seem to be connected, not by obvious causes, but by their meaning. This notion unfolds at the crossroads of psychology, philosophy and, to some extent, spirituality, challenging our conventional understanding of how events in the world are interrelated.

To begin with, it is very important to understand that Jung introduced synchronicity not as a causal explanation, but as a principle of acausal connection. According to Jung, there are certain events that, although not directly related to each other in terms of cause and effect, present such a remarkable coincidence of meanings that it awakens in us a sense of wonder and mystery. It is as if the universe were speaking through coincidences that are not mere coincidences, but manifestations of something deeper and more significant.

To illustrate this concept, let’s imagine a situation: you are thinking intensely about an old friend with whom you have lost touch. Suddenly, and for no apparent reason, you receive a call from this friend on the same day. According to synchronicity, this coincidence is not simply a random act of fate. Rather, it is a meaningful conjunction of internal and external events that reflect a larger underlying reality. The fundamental question here is not “How did this happen?”, but “What does this mean?”.

Jung considered synchronicity to be closely related to the collective unconscious, a dimension of the psyche that transcends the personal unconscious and harbors universal archetypes, patterns and symbols shared by all humanity. In this sense, synchronistic experiences could be considered manifestations of these archetypes, which emerge at crucial moments in our lives to guide us, warn us or simply make us aware of certain underlying truths.

Synchronicity also intersects with the idea that the universe is not a cold mechanical system devoid of meaning, but a living field of possibilities, where mind and matter are not completely separate. This perspective aligns with certain interpretations of quantum physics, which suggest that reality is far more interconnected and interdependent than our everyday perceptions allow us to see. Jung collaborated with physicist Wolfgang Pauli to explore these intersections, although his ideas remain more metaphysical than scientific in the strict sense.

In my personal experience, I have found that synchronicity often appears at times of significant personal change or periods of intense inner reflection. It is as if the act of paying deep attention to our inner processes opens a doorway to a world where meaning and matter meet. Through synchronicity, we seem to get glimpses of a wider web of meaning, a symbolic language that speaks directly to the soul.

Synchronicity should not be confused with magical or superstitious thinking. It does not imply that every event in our lives has a hidden meaning or that we are the center of the universe. Rather, it invites us to consider that our understanding of reality and how things work may be more limited than we think, and that there may be dimensions of experience and knowledge that are beyond our immediate perception.

Synchronicity, according to Jung, invites us to look beyond the surface of our experiences and consider the possibility that there are deeper and more meaningful connections at play. Although it remains an esoteric and largely unprovable concept from a scientific perspective, it offers an intriguing and enriching insight into the human psyche and the universe in which we live. It reminds us that there are mysteries in life that are still waiting to be explored and understood, and that sometimes, the most surprising coincidences can be windows to deeper truths.

In the practice of psychology, synchronicity can be a very powerful tool for transformation. It can help individuals connect with aspects of their unconscious, reveal hidden dynamics in their lives, or even open pathways to new ways of understanding their experiences and relationships. When therapists pay attention to synchronistic moments reported by their patients, they can discover doorways to understanding and healing.

Synchronicity is often intertwined with spirituality. Many spiritual and religious traditions recognize the existence of meaningful coincidences as signs from the universe, divine messages or answers to inner questions. In this respect, synchronicity can be an avenue for greater self-awareness and spiritual growth.

In everyday life, synchronicity can be a tool for personal reflection and development. It can encourage people to pay attention to their surroundings, to coincidences and unexpected events, using them as starting points for introspection and self-discovery.

El escarabajo dorado es uno de los ejemplos de Jung sobre la sincronicidad.

This story impressively illustrates how external events can resonate meaningfully with a person’s inner processes, suggesting a deeper and more mysterious connection between the psyche and the material world.

The story goes like this: Jung was in a therapeutic session with a patient. This patient was quite rationalistic and had some difficulty accepting Jung’s ideas about the unconscious and the deeper meanings of personal experiences. At a key point in the therapy, she was telling Jung about a dream she had had the night before, in which she had been given a golden beetle – a symbol of rebirth in many cultures, but something alien to her conscious reality.

As the patient recounted her dream, Jung heard a noise at the window of his office. He got up and opened the window, and to his surprise, a real beetle – specifically, a Cetonia aurata, which is a type of golden-green beetle common in that area – flew in. Jung caught the beetle and presented it to his patient saying, “Here is your golden beetle.”

This startling event had a profound impact on the patient. The improbability of a golden beetle appearing just as she was recounting her dream about a similar beetle was astounding. This event broke through her rationalistic resistance and opened her mind to the possibility that there are meaningful connections in the world that cannot be explained through linear causality.

For Jung, this incident was not just an amazing coincidence, but a perfect example of synchronicity. It represented a significant confluence between the patient’s inner world (her dream) and an external event (the appearance of the beetle) that had no direct causal connection but were linked by their meaning and symbolism.

Jung used this event as an illustration of how the collective unconscious can manifest in the real world, suggesting a layer of reality in which the mind and the material world are intertwined in mysterious and meaningful ways. It was a demonstration of how synchronistic events can serve as catalysts for psychological change and awareness, opening people to a deeper understanding of themselves and their place in the cosmos.

As you might guess, synchronicity is not without its critics and detractors (not without reason, of course). Let us briefly describe some of the arguments and criticisms of the concept proposed by Carl Jung.

Lack of Scientific Rigor

One of the strongest criticisms against synchronicity is its apparent lack of scientific rigor. The scientific method is based on the replicability and falsifiability of hypotheses. However, synchronicity, by relying on meaningful and subjective coincidences, defies this replicability. Synchronous events are by nature unique and cannot be reproduced under controlled conditions, which poses a problem for their study and scientific validation.

Subjectivity and Confirmation Bias

Another point of criticism is the inherently subjective nature of synchronicity. What one person may perceive as a meaningful coincidence, another may see as simply a random event. This subjectivity is further compounded by confirmation bias, where people tend to notice and remember events that confirm their beliefs and ignore those that do not. This can lead to an overinterpretation of certain events as synchronous when they are in fact mere coincidences.

Fostering Superstition

Some critics argue that synchronicity can encourage superstition and magical thinking. In a world where synchronicity is seen as significant, random events may be misinterpreted as signs or messages from the universe or a divine force. This could lead people to make important decisions based on coincidences rather than logical reasoning or evidence.

Epistemological Problems

Synchronicity also raises epistemological problems, i.e., issues related to the nature and limits of knowledge. By attributing meaning to coincidences, synchronicity challenges conventional notions of causality and evidence. This begs the question of how the reality of these“meaningful connections” can be known and validated, and what criteria can be used to distinguish between true synchronicity and mere coincidence.

Reduction of Self-Determinism

A related criticism of individual psychology is that synchronicity may reduce the perception of self-determinism or self-control. If significant events are seen as part of a predestined synchronous pattern, this may diminish the sense of personal control and responsibility over one’s own decisions and actions.

Difficulties in Clinical Practice

In clinical practice, using synchronicity as a therapeutic tool can be problematic. While it may offer profound insights for some patients, for others it can lead to misinterpretations of their experiences and potentially harmful decisions based on these interpretations.

Ismael Abogado

Ismael Abogado

Psychologist and constant learner of the mind and soul.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *